<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Nuclear on Hormuz.net</title>
    <link>https://hormuz.net/tags/nuclear/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Nuclear on Hormuz.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://hormuz.net/tags/nuclear/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Rubio Is Right: The Strait of Hormuz Is Iran&#39;s Economic Nuclear Weapon</title>
      <link>https://hormuz.net/rubio-is-right-the-strait-of-hormuz-is-irans-economic-nuclear-weapon/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hormuz.net/rubio-is-right-the-strait-of-hormuz-is-irans-economic-nuclear-weapon/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently put it bluntly: the Strait of Hormuz is &amp;ldquo;basically the equivalent of an economic nuclear weapon that Iran is trying to use against the world.&amp;rdquo; He wasn&amp;rsquo;t being hyperbolic. He was being precise.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Iran has spent years bragging about its ability to choke the strait — the narrow waterway through which roughly 20 percent of the world&amp;rsquo;s traded oil passes. Every tanker carrying Saudi, Emirati, Kuwaiti, or Iraqi crude to Asia and Europe transits those 21 miles. Iran sits on one shore. The threat is structural, permanent, and deliberate.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tehran&#39;s Hormuz Offer Returns Trump to Square One</title>
      <link>https://hormuz.net/tehrans-hormuz-offer-returns-trump-to-square-one/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hormuz.net/tehrans-hormuz-offer-returns-trump-to-square-one/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Iran has reportedly floated a deal: reopen the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for postponing nuclear talks. The framing is generous to Tehran on its face. It treats two unrelated problems as commensurate, and it trades a closure Iran has no right to impose for a delay on the only question that actually matters. Accepting it would not advance American policy. It would erase it.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Hormuz is a tactical disruption. The strait carries roughly a fifth of global oil shipments and any closure produces a real price spike, but the disruption is also temporary. Tankers reroute. Insurance markets adjust. Naval coalitions form. Every closure threat in the past four decades has ended the same way: the price comes down, the ships move, and Iran absorbs the political cost of having weaponized international waters. UNCLOS does not recognize Iran&amp;rsquo;s authority to close the strait in the first place. Treating its reopening as a concession is to legitimize a blockade that has no legal foundation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
