<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hormuz Mou on Hormuz.net</title>
    <link>https://hormuz.net/tags/hormuz-mou/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Hormuz Mou on Hormuz.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://hormuz.net/tags/hormuz-mou/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Trump Says &#39;Permanently Toll-Free,&#39; Iran Says &#39;Service Fees&#39;: The Hormuz MOU Is Already Cracking</title>
      <link>https://hormuz.net/trump-says-permanently-toll-free-iran-says-service-fees-the-hormuz-mou-is-already-cracking/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hormuz.net/trump-says-permanently-toll-free-iran-says-service-fees-the-hormuz-mou-is-already-cracking/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Two governments signed the same 14-point memorandum on June 14. They are now describing two different documents.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Washington&amp;rsquo;s version: the Strait of Hormuz is &amp;ldquo;permanently toll-free,&amp;rdquo; full stop, no negotiation. Tehran&amp;rsquo;s version: the free-passage clause was always a 60-day bridge, after which Iran collects &amp;ldquo;service fees&amp;rdquo; for security, environmental protection, and insurance coordination — dressed up as a Dardanelles-style tariff, not a toll. Both readings can cite the same MOU, because the MOU only commits to zero charges for the 60-day ceasefire window and says nothing definitive about what comes after.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
